The Dirkx (2006) article opens by starting that "central to development of authenticity in teaching is self-understanding and self-awareness. Using a Jungian perspective, the author suggests that the imaginative dimensions of the self play a critical role in our journey and experience as teachers, and in developing self-awareness and authenticity in our teaching."
Firstly, are there any ways in which you believe your imagination has contributed to your self-knowledge and/or your path to authenticity?
Secondly, are there any practices you engage in that help you connect to these images of the psyche and which aid in your own self-discovery? How do you integrate these different experiences, so as to embody them at a soul level, learn from them and transform?
As a practicing artist and art educator, imagination, self-awareness, and self-knowledge are conversations that often come up in my practice and in the classroom. My work draws upon life experiences as a way of navigating material with emotion--in order to make meaning in our daily lives through the artistic process. This is also how I approach my classroom, I feel making art, albeit writing creatively or painting, dancing, playing music, etc. are a combination, and if I may, a journey towards cultivating a sense of self-awareness and authenticity.
The following quote from Dirkx (2006) resonated with my thoughts as an educator:
"Teaching with a sense of authenticity reflects a profound sense
of self-awareness and self-understanding. It draws our attention to the character of the teacher, its importance in the overall quality of our relationships
with learners, and the effectiveness of learning experiences that we as teachers plan and facilitate" (p.30).
I think, from the perspective of an art educator, although art is subjective I feel that the best teachers and those that are most confident and aware of their practice. If you are fully self-aware of your process and practice, you are able to translate your methods of meaning-making and creative practice to a classroom, I think, successfully. This doesn't always happen though. Someone can be a great artist and a horrible mentor and teacher. This is actually a tricky topic in the field of Art Education, many Universities recruit famous, successful artists as faculty in order to attract students, but at times, these faculty do not have the best pedagogical approach for fostering creativity within their students. So I have mixed feelings about this question, because it is so circumstantial.
I think for me remaining visually stimulated is a way to open up my psyche and window of self discovery. This can be as simple as getting lost on the internet looking at (landscape, spacial) images that inspire my practice. Moreover, going to museums and galleries and parks also give me the space to reflect and imagine.
Sometimes images and experiences will pour into my everyday life synchronistically. I take it as a sign and actively & intentionally incorporate it in my work. For example, if I start to notice certain colors coming into my life or recurring words or images. If these symbols are, in fact, talking to me, I try to have a conversation through my writing and painting. This is something I ask my students to consider as well. How our seemingly mundane routines can give us little morsels to work with and transform.
Hunt (2006) outlines many barriers to authenticity including institutional, structural, policy, and social barriers. I feel there are many more barriers both internal and external.
I am wondering if you could share personal definition or understanding of authenticity? What does authenticity mean to you?
Also, what barriers to authenticity have you faced? How did you overcome them? What advice/perspectives/growing experiences can you share with others in overcoming barriers to authenticity?
I think my definition of authenticity falls under a majority definition of simply being yourself and staying true to your heart. And yet, this notion reminds me of the quote “To become authentic we require a thirst for freedom.” This brings me back to the discussion last week about social change and freedom from oppression. As we navigate different social, physical, temporal, etc. constructs are we truly able to remain authentic? Is authenticity transient? And are we really the only ones to self-affirm our authenticity?
Hunt's (2006) questions and conclusion about the complex process of authenticity has stayed with me and continues to percolate as I navigate my week teaching and pushing my students to create something they are proud of:
"How to intervene in such a process without becoming
someone you do not want to be? How easy is it to become that person, point
out the sources that were ignored and the voices that were silenced, direct
the students toward the publications that questioned their conclusions and,
at the same time, forget that it was not what you wanted in the long run?" (p. 62).
In terms of personal barriers I've faced regarding my authenticity, being someone from a multi-cultural household I often find myself code-switching based on the different environments and situations I am in. I'll act differently with different people, yet is this to say I am not being my authentic self? This navigation and negotiation is something that I still struggle with.
A few friday's ago, I want to say it was the 8th? I gave my usual talk at the American Folk Art Museum as their Education Fellow. The tour went really well as I had a diverse group of people and age groups. There was one older white gentleman that had made a few odd, Donald Trump remarks throughout the tour, but I was able to steer away from that and onto the exhibitions we were looking at. After the tour the gentleman approached me and asked for my name to attend another one of my tours. As a representative of the museum, I obliged and showed him my badge. He was an older man and took lots of pictures during our tour, so perhaps he had a memory problem? Once he saw my name he had asked it's origin, so I told him that it was Mexican. He proceeded to tell me that most of my family must have been "rapists, drug dealers, murderers, and illegal immigrants." I didn't know what to say other than "I hope that was sarcasm." I bring this up because I thought to myself if my appearance had looked 'more Mexican' would he have even said those words to me? Should I have dressed differently? Talked differently? Sometimes I struggle with navigating and negotiating my authentic self because of societal barriers that permeate our everyday lives.
I think authenticity is challenging because it makes us vulnerable and susceptible to so many (un)predictable things.
In the Cranton article, the overarching theme is that “Authenticity in teaching has to do with self-awareness, awareness of others, relationships, context, and leading a critical life.” And, further, that “Fostering authentic relationships has something to do with each of these five facets of authenticity”.
Do you agree or disagree with these statements and if so, why or why not?
In your own experience how have you fostered any of all of the espoused five-faceted pillars of authenticity introduced in the article?
I think Cranton's article really goes hand-in-hand with Kornelsen's work on teaching with presence. Kornelsen writes:
[T]eachers need to manifest those traits that invite presence: presence of themselves, of their learners,
and of the subject-content. Teaching with presence means teaching in a way
that encourages openness, imbues vitality, and sometimes abandons order.
I believe in order to be aware of ourself, others, our relationships, context, and lead a critical life, we need to cultivate a sense of presence. My only question about this is, how much? I think Cranton's & Kornelsen's traits and themes regarding authenticity and presence are valid, but at what level do we need to imbue these characteristics with ourselves in order to make them affective? I think there is also something really moving about educators that are humble in their actions and delivery of knowledge, to admit that there is that window of unknown as well can be very powerful. If that makes any sense.
If I have to give an example of how I've fostered the pillars of authenticity, would think that my practice as a teacher does this. Because I believe in student-centered learning, I usually like to let my students drive the course. I'm there to give them tools and help cultivate skillsets so that they can feel empowered as their own artistic self and agent of change. Granted this extreme flexibility happens with my private students.
When I'm teaching within an institution this may present some challenges if I'm co-teaching or even, as a museum educator giving tours on our exhibitions on view. It can be extremely challenging to cultivate all five pillars with each an every person that attends the open to public, drop in tours. As you may have heard in the barrier discussion about my encounter with the older gentleman. In these instances, I am not sure if it is quite possible to practice all five pillars? Any thoughts?